| What is open peer review? A systematic review T Ross-Hellauer F1000Research 6, 2017 | 572* | 2017 |
| A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review JP Tennant, JM Dugan, D Graziotin, DC Jacques, F Waldner, D Mietchen, ... F1000Research 6, 2017 | 305 | 2017 |
| The limitations to our understanding of peer review JP Tennant, T Ross-Hellauer Research Integrity and Peer Review 5 (1), 1-14, 2020 | 279 | 2020 |
| Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers T Ross-Hellauer, A Deppe, B Schmidt PloS one 12 (12), e0189311, 2017 | 249 | 2017 |
| Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research T Ross-Hellauer, JP Tennant, V Banelytė, E Gorogh, D Luzi, P Kraker, ... PLOS Computational Biology 16 (4), e1007704, 2020 | 176 | 2020 |
| Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing JP Tennant, H Crane, T Crick, J Davila, A Enkhbayar, J Havemann, ... Publications 7 (2), 1-24, 2019 | 127 | 2019 |
| The open science training handbook S Bezjak, A Clyburne-Sherin, P Conzett, PL Fernandes, E Görögh, ... [sn], 2018 | 117 | 2018 |
| Guidelines for open peer review implementation T Ross-Hellauer, E Görögh Research Integrity and Peer Review 4 (1), 4, 2019 | 95 | 2019 |
| Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review T Ross-Hellauer, S Reichmann, NL Cole, A Fessl, T Klebel, N Pontika Royal Society Open Science 9, 2022 | 93 | 2022 |
| Ten considerations for open peer review B Schmidt, T Ross-Hellauer, X van Edig, EC Moylan F1000Research 7, 2018 | 85 | 2018 |
| Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals T Klebel, S Reichmann, J Polka, G McDowell, N Penfold, S Hindle, ... PLoS ONE 15 (10), 2020 | 71 | 2020 |
| Open science, done wrong, will compound inequities T Ross-Hellauer Nature 603, 363, 2022 | 67 | 2022 |
| Unlock ways to share data on peer review F Squazzoni, P Ahrweiler, T Barros, F Bianchi, A Birukou, HJJ Blom, ... Nature 578 (7796), 512-514, 2020 | 54 | 2020 |
| Are Funder Open Access Platforms a Good Idea? T Ross-Hellauer, B Schmidt, B Kramer SAGE Open 8 (4), 2018 | 41 | 2018 |
| The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing T Klebel, T Ross-Hellauer Quantitative Science Studies 4 (1), 22-43, 2023 | 38* | 2023 |
| Indicators of research quality, quantity, openness and responsibility in institutional review, promotion and tenure policies across seven countries N Pontika, T Klebel, A Correia, H Metzler, P Knoth, T Ross-Hellauer Quantitative Science Studies, 2022 | 38 | 2022 |
| Foundations for open scholarship strategy development J Tennant, J Beamer, J Bosman, B Brembs, NC Chung, G Clement, ... MetaArXiv, 2019 | 30 | 2019 |
| Ten myths around open scholarly publishing JP Tennant, H Crane, T Crick, J Davila, A Enkhbayar, J Havemann, ... | 25 | 2019 |
| Global Thinking: ON-MERRIT recommendations for maximising equity in open and responsible research NL Cole, S Reichmann, T Ross-Hellauer Zenodo, 2022 | 23 | 2022 |
| Reproducibility in Machine Learning-Driven Research H Semmelrock, S Kopeinik, D Theiler, T Ross-Hellauer, D Kowald arXiv, 2023 | 22 | 2023 |
