| Conceptualizing and Measuring Popularity AHN Cillessen, PEL Marks Popularity in the Peer System, 25-56, 2012 | 397 | 2012 |
| The effects of participation rate on the internal reliability of peer nomination measures PEL Marks, B Babcock, AHN Cillessen, NR Crick Social Development 22 (3), 609-622, 2013 | 208 | 2013 |
| Methodological choices in peer nomination research AHN Cillessen, PEL Marks New directions for child and adolescent development 2017 (157), 21-44, 2017 | 122 | 2017 |
| Limited nomination reliability using single‐and multiple‐item measures B Babcock, PEL Marks, NR Crick, AHN Cillessen Social Development 23 (3), 518-536, 2014 | 58 | 2014 |
| Popularity Contagion Among Adolescents PEL Marks, AHN Cillessen, NR Crick Social Development 21 (3), 501-521, 2012 | 48 | 2012 |
| Introduction to the Special Issue: 20th‐Century Origins and 21st‐Century Developments of Peer Nomination Methodology PEL Marks New directions for child and adolescent development 2017 (157), 7-19, 2017 | 10 | 2017 |
| Relations between alphabetized name order and nomination counts in peer nomination measures PEL Marks, AHN Cillessen, B Babcock Social Development 25 (4), 866-874, 2016 | 10 | 2016 |
| On the empirical identification and evaluation of “expert nominators” PEL Marks, B Babcock, AHN Cillessen International Journal of Behavioral Development 39 (2), 186-193, 2015 | 10 | 2015 |
| Adolescent popularity as a nonlinear, two-dimensional construct: Convergent results from three large samples PEL Marks, B Babcock, YHM van den Berg, R Gommans, AHN Cillessen The Journal of Early Adolescence 42 (1), 115-142, 2022 | 9 | 2022 |
| Implications of systematic nominator missingness for peer nomination data B Babcock, PEL Marks, YHM van den Berg, AHN Cillessen International Journal of Behavioral Development 42 (1), 148-154, 2018 | 9 | 2018 |
| Effects of including versus excluding nonparticipants as potential nominees in peer nomination measures PEL Marks, B Babcock, YHM van den Berg, AHN Cillessen International Journal of Behavioral Development 43 (3), 255-262, 2019 | 6 | 2019 |
| Conceptualizing and measuring popularity In Cillessen AHN, Schwartz D, & Mayeux L (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 25–56) AHN Cillessen, PEL Marks New York, NY: Guilford Press US.[Google Scholar], 2011 | 6 | 2011 |
| Adolescent popularity: A positive psychology course with a developmental foundation PEL Marks Positive Psychology in Higher Education, 36-41, 2014 | 5 | 2014 |
| International perspectives on popularity: The meanings and constructions of popularity across cultures PEL Marks, AHN Cillessen, E Andreou, C Berger, WM Bukowski, ... Manuscript submitted for publication, 2009 | 5 | 2009 |
| Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups NR Crick, D Murray-Close, PE Marks, N Mohajeri-Nelson, K Rubin, ... The Guilford Press, 2009 | 5 | 2009 |
| The importance of considering and reporting sources of error in peer nomination research: A response to Bukowski et al. B Babcock, PEL Marks, YHM van den Berg, AHN Cillessen International Journal of Behavioral Development 46 (2), 142-147, 2022 | | 2022 |
| (Eds.). New directions in peer nomination methodology [spec. iss.] PEL Marks, AHN Cillessen | | 2017 |
| Adolescent popularity: A positive psychology course with a developmental foundation (vol 6, pg 314, 2011) PEL Marks JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 6 (6), 514-514, 2011 | | 2011 |
| Adolescent popularity: its relation to friendship characteristics and Its contagion among friends. PE Marks | | 2010 |
| The following manuscript represents the accepted version of the article published as: Marks, PEL, Cillessen, AHN, & Crick, NR (2012). Popularity contagion among adolescents … PEL Marks | | |
