Cross‐linguistic differences in processing double‐embedded relative clauses: Working‐memory constraints or language statistics? SL Frank, T Trompenaars, S Vasishth Cognitive science 40 (3), 554-578, 2016 | 114 | 2016 |
Hypercorrection as a by-product of education F Hubers, T Trompenaars, S Collin, K De Schepper, H De Hoop Applied Linguistics 41 (4), 552-574, 2020 | 37 | 2020 |
The language of an inanimate narrator T Trompenaars, L Hogeweg, W Stoop, H De Hoop Open Linguistics 4 (1), 707-721, 2018 | 12 | 2018 |
Cognitive animacy and its relation to linguistic animacy: Evidence from Japanese and Persian T Trompenaars, TA Kaluge, R Sarabi, P De Swart Language Sciences 86, 101399, 2021 | 9 | 2021 |
Empathy for the inanimate T Trompenaars Linguistics in the Netherlands 35 (1), 125-138, 2018 | 4 | 2018 |
Bringing Stories to Life. Animacy in narrative and processing T Trompenaars Amsterdam: LOT, 2021 | 2 | 2021 |
Relative Clauses In Context An EEG study on the influence of topicality cues on grammatical role assignment T Trompenaars | | 2017 |
The Strawberry, the Peanut and the Cupboard T Trompenaars | | 2013 |
ADOPTING THE INANIMATE VIEWPOINT IN NARRATIVE FICTION T Trompenaars | | |